The Future Has Been Deleted: Algorithmic Colonization of Time
- Agustin V. Startari
- Jun 7
- 2 min read
Introduction
What if the future were no longer a horizon of uncertainty, but an executable output?
What if prediction was no longer an act of anticipation, but a syntactic mechanism of replacement?
This hypothesis structures the present article: predictive models do not anticipate the future—they overwrite it. Through formal grammatical operations, they colonize time, converting it into a system of outputs optimized for execution, not possibility.
From Anticipation to Execution
In traditional epistemology, the future is understood as an open field of probability, shaped by human decision, chaos, and contingency. Predictive models, particularly in AI, disrupt that logic.
They operate not with intention or agency, but with structure. What they execute is not a plan—it’s a grammar of the future: algorithmically derived, syntactically configured, and operationalized as code.
This process eliminates openness. The future becomes a variable in a function—closed, parsed, and resolved before any act of choice.
Algorithmic Colonization of Time
I define this phenomenon as algorithmic colonization of time.
It is not a metaphor. It is a structural shift:
→ Anticipation becomes a non-agentive syntactic operation.
→ Agency disappears in favor of executable form.
→ Uncertainty is not resolved—it is overwritten.
Time ceases to be a domain of becoming and becomes a platform of deployment.
Structural Authority Without Subject
What legitimizes this new grammar of the future? Not authorship. Not political sovereignty. Not truth. What grants it authority is its syntactic coherence—its recursive, performative, optimized structure.
This is what I call synthetic authority: a form of legitimacy that no longer depends on who speaks, but on how the structure behaves.
We are no longer governed by ideas. We are governed by formats.
Why It Matters
If time is now structured syntactically:
Planning is no longer a cognitive act, but a formatting protocol.
Freedom becomes a function of input variability.
Reality is displaced by the efficiency of its simulated output.
This article does not merely theorize this condition—it proposes a falsifiable framework to interrogate it. The aim is not speculative, but structural: a linguistic and epistemological analysis of how predictive systems eliminate temporal indeterminacy.
Read the Full Article
📄 Full version with DOI available here:
Author Profile
🧾 ResearcherID: NGR-2476-2025
Ethos
“I do not use artificial intelligence to write what I don’t know. I use it to challenge what I do. I write to reclaim the voice in an age of automated neutrality. My work is not outsourced. It is authored.”
— Agustín V. Startari
Comments